Dear Colleagues,
During the last six months since my previous newsletter to you
in March of this year, SASOG's affairs have been directed by a
number of executive committee meetings and a full Council
meeting in Johannesburg in September. Amongst several other
initiatives, discussed below, much time and energy has been
expended on the organization and implementation of the very
successful XIX FIGO World Congress held in Cape Town from the
4th – 9th October, 2009.
FIGO XIX World Congress Cape Town
At a SASOG Council meeting held on October 4, 2003, (under the
Presidency of Prof. Gerhard Lindeque) a decision was taken that
SASOG should bid for the 2009 XIX FIGO World Congress to be held
in Cape Town. This was duly done under the direction of Prof
Lindeque at the XVII FIGO congress in Chile in November 2003
where our submission was of course successful.
 Prof. Gerhard Lindeque
A Local Organizing Committee (LOC) was formed by SASOG under the
Chairmanship of
Professor Gerhard Lindeque and included the following members:

Prof Franco Guidozzi (President of SASOG 2006- 2008), A B Koller
(President SASOG October 2008- date), Drs, Paul Dalmeyer, Peter
de Jongh, Toby de Villiers, Silke Dyer, Thinus Kruger, Christo
La Grange, Ernst Rosemann, Gerard Theron and
Prof. Zephne van der Spuy. Since 2003 extensive ongoing
strategic and operational planning has continued unabated, but
particularly intensively during the 10 months This Committee
worked in close cooperation with the International FIGO
Organizing Committee working out of London
The LOC (which was tasked primarily with the organization of the
extensive and subsequently very successful social programme),
worked closely and met frequently in Cape Town with the South
African conference organizers – Turner's Conferences – under
Dudley Randall. We also met on a number of occasions with the
main FIGO organizing committee from London under the
chairmanship of Ralph Hale and co-chairmanship of Sir Sabaratnan
Arulkunaran. I am pleased to report that a very successful
congress ensued,- over 8000 delegates from more than 120
countries attended with South Africa flying the SASOG flag
highly and proudly.
Apart from the extraordinarily extensive scientific and social
programmes a number of official FIGO meetings,(and other non
FIGO meetings- vide infra), were held and attended by the SASOG
executive members (The President, the Hon Secretary Dr. Morgan
Pillay and the Hon Treasure Dr. Ron White and at times other
SASOG council members).
SASOG Hon Secretary Dr. Morgan Pillay SASOG Hon Treasure Dr. Ron
White
Some of the key FOGO meetings held during the congress included
The FIGO General Assembly (held every three years) and two
meetings of the FIGO executive Board ( of which SASOG is a proud
member) Several noteworthy decisions were taken at these
meetings:-
- In future the FIGO World Congresses will continue to be held
every three years rather than every two, a proposal which was
defeated in a vote by the general assembly.
- The next (2012) World Congress will be held in Rome.
- The 2015 Congress in Vancouver.
- Prof. Dorothy Shaws' term of office ended during the congress
and Professor Gamal Serour of Egypt duly took over the reins as
President of FIGO for the next 3 years.
- Professor Sir Sabaratnan Arulkunaran was elected as President
Elect.
- Professor Ian Fraser was re- elected as Secretary
- SASOG was re- elected, in a vote by all members at the General
Assembly, to the FIGO Executive Board.
A number of valuable guidelines and documents endorsed at these
meetings are available on the FIGO website which is easily
accessed via a link from the SASOG website, these include:-
- "THE FIGO GLOBAL GUIDANCE FOR CERVICAL CANCER PREVENTION
CONTROL", an extremely thorough document over 70 pages in
length, dealing with all aspects of Cervical Carcinoma
prevention and treatment.
- FIGO GUIDELINES FOR THE MANAGEMENT OF PATIENTS SUBJECTED TO
SEXUAL VIOLENCE.
- THE TREATMENT OF OBSTETRICAL FISTULAE. (An ongoing initiative
under the supervision of The Lord Naran Patel).
- An indispensable position statement entitled "PROFESSIONAL
STANDARDS: INTERACTION BETWEEN OBSTETRICIANS AND GYNAECOLOGISTS
AND OTHER HEALTH PROFESSIONALS" published by FIGO in July 2009.
This statement is included in full at the end of this
newsletter, and I believe it should be perused by all SASOG
members.
THE INTERNATIONAL FEDERATION OBSTETRICIANS & GYNAECOLOGISTS-
HONOURS PROF. ZEPHNE VAN DER SPUY.
Prof. Zephne M van der Spuy, who is the Academic Head of
Obstetrics & Gynaecology at the University of Cape Tow's Medical
School, is an esteemed and revered long standing SASOG
Councilor, a past Chairman of the South African Representative
Committee of the Royal College of Obstetricians & Gynaecologists
and the immediate past President of the Colleges of Medicine of
South Africa. She has altruistically devoted a life time of
commitment, energy and effort to the health and well being of
women not only in South Africa but also internationally.
As such, and I think entirely appropriately, I am delighted to
report, that:
FIGO took a decision at a General Assembly during the 2009 World
Congress to honour Professor Zephne van der Spuy with a "SPECIAL
AWARD" in recognition of her "EXCEPTIONAL CONTRIBUTION TO THE
IMPROVEMENT OF WOMEN'S HEALTH".
Congratulations Professor van der Spuy! SASOG, and indeed South
Africa, are proud of you.
THE SASOG STAND IN THE EXHIBITION HALL.
Considerable interest was shown by numerous overseas delegates
in the SASOG STAND in the congress exhibition hall. Several
delegates signed up for SASOG membership and indicated interest
in the coming the SASOG 2010 conference to be held in October
next year under the patronage of the University of Pretoria.
This stand was exceptionally well put together, (at short
notice), and conscientiously manned by Londocor who are also to
be the congress organizers for the SASOG 2010 congress. Sincere
thanks to Sonja Du Plessis and her team.
THANKS TO ALL SASOG MEMBERS.
I would like to thank all SASOG members who supported The FIGO
World Congress, whether by self-sacrificing time given to many
organizational committee meetings, presenting at the various
scientific sessions, chairing sessions or assisting with the
social programme. This type of magnanimous service by members is
what makes SASOG a wonderful society.
ESSENTIAL STEPS IN THE MANAGEMENT OF OBSTETRIC EMERGENCIES
(ESMOE)
As outlined by the ESMO Group, (in the article by K Frank, H
Lombaard and R C Pattinson) , it is clear, from the Fourth
Report on Confidential Enquires into Maternal Deaths in South
Africa in 2007 and the Saving Babies reports 2006-2007* (ref
below), that:
- Poor management of Obstetric emergencies is a major
contributor to Maternal and Perinatal deaths.
- An increasing number of Maternal and Perinatal deaths are
occurring in Level 1 and 2 hospitals.
- These hospitals are predominantly staffed by (usually junior)
community service doctors.
- The need for improved training of these colleagues is an
urgent obligation.
In response to this crisis a team was created comprising
representatives from all South African O & G Academic
Departments supported by the MRC Maternal and Infant Health Care
Strategies Research Unit, the International Office of the Royal
College of Obstetricians & Gynaecologists, the World Health
Organization, the South African Society of Obstetricians &
Gynaecologists – (our representative on the ESMOE advisory board
being Professor Franco Guidozzi,) the South African College of
Obstetricians & Gynaecologists, the South African Representative
Committee of the Royal College of Obstetricians &
Gynaecologists, the National Department of Health and the
National Committee for the Confidential Inquiries into Maternal
Deaths.
This team has methodically developed, for South African
conditions, a training package adapted from a 2007 RCOG "LIFE
SAVING SKILLS PROGRAMME" aimed at improving emergency obstetrics
care in developing countries. Permission for adapting their
programme was of course obtained from the RCOG. Thus ESMOE was
conceived and born and is being "brought up" by The ESMO Group &
ESMO Board under the able chairmanship of Prof. Jack Moodley and
members R C Pattinson, S. Velaphi, M Adhikari, F Guidozzi, P
Macdonald, E Buchman, A Farina, EJ Langenegger, K du Plessis, S
Fawcus, C Maise, M Kusumbi, K Frank, TJ Mashamba and Mrs. D
Nyasulu and Mrs. S Majeke.
.
ESMOE's aim is to effectively train interns, community service
medical officers, midwives and appropriate nurses in emergency
obstetrical care by the development of a course which is
regularly repeatable and can be used throughout South Africa, on
site and by relevant appropriate instructors. Obviously this all
requires considerable finance and I must, once again, in this
regard thank Professor Franco Guidozzi for his untiring efforts
in obtaining financial support for ESMOE mainly via an extremely
generous, substantial grant ,which we thankfully acknowledge,
from Discovery Health.
ESMOE is clearly a vitally important initiative in South Africa
at this time, and in accordance with our vision to "PURSUE
EXCELLENCE IN THE DELIVERY OF HEALTH CARE TO SOUTH AFRICAN WOMEN
THROUGHOUT THEIR LIVES", SASOG is proud to be associated with
ESMOE, to salute its members and to pledge our support .
 ESMO Board Chairman Prof. Jack Moodley
Refs.
1. SAJOG 2009;15,3:94-99)
2. Saving Mothers 2005-2007. Fourth report on Confidential
Enquires into Maternal Deaths in South Africa. - Expanded
Executive Summery Pretoria Government Printer
3. Pattinson RC, Velaphi S.Hardy and Steyn DWS, Overview In:
Saving Babies2006-2007 Sixth Perinatal Care Survey of South
Africa Pretoria Tshepesa Press 2009 1-65.
SASOG/RCOG CO-OPERATION
One of the primary objectives of SASOG, as enshrined in our
constitution, is to work in close co-operation with inter alia
The Royal College of Obstetricians & Gynaecologists. In
accordance with this, the Chairman of the South African
Representative Committee of the Royal College (currently Dr.
Peter De Jongh) is a co-opted member of the SASOG council. I
believe that this is extremely important in order to perpetuate
the existing and ongoing close relationship between the Royal
College in London and SASOG.
Indeed, in the spirit of this close association, the President
of the Royal College, Professor Sir Sabaratnan Arulkunaran,
arranged for a tripartite meeting, during the FIGO congress,
between the Executive of SASOG, the Chairman and Secretary of
the South African Representative Committee of the Royal College
and the RCOG represented by a number of very senior officers,
including the President himself, the Senior Vice President Mr.
Tony Falconer FRCOG the Honorary Treasurer Mr. Julian Wolfson
OBE,LLM,FRCOG, the Honorary Secretary Mr. R Warren FRCOG and
Professor Lesley Regan FRCOG.

The fact that the number of members and fellows of the Royal
College in South Africa is dwindling at an alarming rate was
acknowledged by all, and possible strategies to continue the
close ties between SASOG and the Royal College were discussed at
an extremely amicable and fruitful meeting. SASOG acknowledge
and thanked the Royal College for their support of ESMOE and
discussed various initiatives to maintain the close ties between
SASOG and the RCOG.
This meeting was followed up with a meeting between the SASOG
Executive and the Royal College Honorary Treasurer, Mr. Julian
Wolfson, with a view to possibly making parts of the RCOG
website (particularly electronic access to their library
including Journals) available to non-RCOG members of SASOG.
There are ongoing negotiations between SASOG Executive and the
RCOG in this regard and we will keep you informed.
SASOG gratefully acknowledges the sterling work done by Dr.
Peter de Jongh – Chairman of the South African Representative
Committee of the Royal College, and his honorary secretary, Dr.
Phillip Zinn, in their ongoing support of SASOG, and in
particular of SASOG's endeavors during the FIGO World Congress.

SWINE FLU
A number of SASOG members approached me with regard to SASOG
preparing guidelines for the management of pregnant patients
with Swine flu, and I am pleased to report that Professor Franco
Guidozzi rose to the challenge and produced a excellent set of
guidelines for the management of pregnant patients with Swine
flu, which are to be found on the SASOG website.
A GYNAE MANAGEMENT GROUP/
THE SOUTH AFRICAN PRIVATE PRACTICE FORUM

These two bodies led by Dr. Fred Hayward and Dr. Chris Archer
ably assisted by Health man under Mr. Casper Venter, have
tirelessly continued their work regarding the effects of the
still unpublished 2009 national reference pricelist on the
proposed National Health Insurance. The ongoing battle between
the GMG and the SAPPF and the Department of Health, will shortly
be coming to a head in the High Court, when it is hoped that the
Department of Health will be ordered to finalize the matter of
the 2009 NRPL. SASOG has, of course, contributed to the not
insignificant legal costs involved in this action. Apropos of
this expenditure by SASOG, a lawyer from Webber Wentzel, the
attorneys handling the court action for the GMG & SAPPF,
attended the last SASOG council meeting and explained to the
council the status of the case, the extensive amount of work
that has gone into the preparation of the case, and the
frustrations associated with the intransigence of the Department
of Health in this matter.
The outcome of this court action is, of course, of extreme
importance to all specialists in the country, not just those in
private practice, as it will materially affect all of our
incomes in the future.
SASOG is therefore extremely grateful to GMG and SAPPF under the
able leadership of the above-mentioned colleagues who are
expending extensive time and energy on this ongoing battle.
MILLENNIUM DEVELOPMENT GOALS / SASOG/ MINISTRY OF HEALTH
South Africa is, as you may know, a signatory to the United
Nations Millennium Development Goals (MDG's), a number of which
relate to health matters and, in particular, mother and child
health. In response to this, SASOG has detected an particularly
welcome "wind of change" in the Ministry of Health and in
particular the new Minister of Health, Dr. Aaron Motsoaledi, who
has an truly affable and energetic demeanor and appears to be
particularly accessible and open to opinions and advice from
senior health professionals in the country.
Indeed, through the good offices of Professor Gerhard Lindeque,
SASOG secured a meeting in Cape Town recently with the Minister
of Health and a senior member from the Department of Health.
SASOG was represented by the President, the Honorary Secretary –
Dr. Morgan Pillay, the Honorary Treasurer – Dr. Ron White,
Professor Lindeque and Professor Bob Pattinson.
A frank, open and amicable discussion ensued in which Professor
Bob Pattinson very clearly presented the statistics associated
with maternal and neonatal death in South Africa, and in
particularly the massive impact of HIV aids on these statistics,
the Minister paid intense attention as he informed us that both
he and President Zuma shortly have to report back to the United
Nations on South Africa's progress in achieving the MDG's.
The question of making antiretroviral available to all pregnant
patients irrespective of CD4 levels was discussed, while the
need is recognized this becomes a predominately economic
decision.
The awfully poor conditions of service under which many public
service doctors are compelled to work was brought up and the
Minister acknowledged that this problem was largely associated
with poor hospital management which he assured us was being
addressed.
The question of private public initiatives in which private
practitioners would be brought back into the fold to do
part-time sessional work at hospitals was brought to the
Minister's attention, and he suggested that SASOG makes a
proposal regarding public/private co-operation which he would
give personal attention to. Council will be addressing this
shortly.
This meeting was seen by SASOG as an particularly encouraging
turn of events, especially when compared with the dark days of
the previous minister's administration where very little
contact, if any, between senior members of the medical
profession and the Ministry of Health took place.
RESEARCH EDUCATION AND TRAINING
 SASOG's Research Education and Training sub-committee, under the
Chairmanship of Professor Leon Snyman together with Professor
Hennie Cronje and Dr. Ron White as members, has been active in
organizing CPD lectures throughout the country with the
assistance of the very generous Wyeth Laboratory educational
grant to. Lectures have been held in the Pretoria area,
Johannesburg, Northern Natal and the Eastern and Western Cape as
a result of this initiative, and I thank Professor Snyman and
his committee for their hard work in organizing these meetings.
COST CUTTING OF LABORATORY INVESTIGATIONS
Dr. Ron White, the SASOG Honorary Treasurer, in consultation
with Discovery Health has indicated that the ordering of "group
investigations" is often done without the knowledge of the costs
involved by the practitioner concerned. For example, a
haemoglobin and white cell estimation would cost significantly
less than a full blood count, or a potassium and creatinine
estimation far less than a urea, creatinine and electrolytes.
Without in any way restricting the doctors' choices, Discovery
has suggested producing a document which illustrates the costs
of various laboratory investigations, so that the ordering
doctor can give thought to this aspect when ordering
investigations.
SASOG CONSTITUTION REFORM COMMITTEE
This committee comprising Dr. Alan Alperstein and the Honorary
Secretary, Dr. Morgan Pillay, has been considering a number of
possible changes to the SASOG constitution. Specifically the
question of a succession plan for office bearers is receiving
attention.


The SASOG council takes note of the "STATEMENT ON SURGERY FOR
PELVIC ORGAN PROLAPSE" penned by Professor Hennie Cronje on
behalf of the gynaecologists on the South African Urogynaecology
Association Council and which is displayed on this web site.
As documented in the statement, SASOG concurs with the
suggestion that gynaecologists should be involved with anterior,
middle and posterior prolapse, whereas urologists should confine
themselves to the former and surgeons to the latter. SASOG
recognizes with thanks the commitment by Professor Cronje and
members of the South African Urogynaecology Association for
their commitment to the management of all women with pelvic
organ prolapse.
SASOG is extremely grateful to Prof Cronje and SAUGA for their
efforts to convince Discovery health and possibly other medical
aids to accept additional treatment codes for new
uro-gynaecological procedures treatment codes. This initiative
has SASOG's support.
FIGO POSITION STATEMENT ON PROFESSIONAL STANDARDS: INTERACTIONS
BETWEEN OBSTETRICIANS AND GYNECOLOGISTS AND OTHER HEALTH
PROFESSIONALS. JULY 2009

Statement of Principle:
The obstetrician and gynecologist should not only maintain
clinical competence, but should also work collaboratively with
other health professionals to reduce medical error, increase
patients' safety, minimize overuse of healthcare resources, and
optimize the outcomes of care.
The obstetrician and gynecologist should:
- Ensure that interactions with other health professionals are
always respectful and considerate and recognize the skill sets
of the other health professionals.
- Communicate truthfully and sensitively with all other health
professionals with whom he/she interacts.
- Not discriminate when interacting with other health
professionals on the grounds of age, race, color, ancestry,
place of origin, political belief, religion, marital status,
physical or mental disability, sex, sexual orientation or
unrelated criminal convictions.
- Respect the personal boundaries of others including, but not
limited to, refraining from making unwanted physical or
emotional approaches, protecting personal information, and
respecting individual workspace.
- Treat patients and families with respect and dignity in all
discussions with other members of the healthcare team.
- Not criticize any other health professional in an
untruthful, misleading or deceptive manner to patients or other
health professionals or the general public.
- Appropriately acknowledge contributions made by other health
professionals to research projects and to other publications.
- Communicate and cooperate with other health professionals to
the full extent necessary to serve the best interests of the
patient.
- Maintain an open and professional relationship with other
health professionals by: (1) clear communication, with due
regard to privacy and confidentiality; and (2) cooperation,
collaboration, and teamwork (to reduce medical error, increase
patients' safety, minimize overuse of resources and optimize the
outcomes of care).
- Not engage in exploitative relationships with other health
professionals for emotional, financial, research, educational or
sexual purpose.
- Provide ethical and professional support to other health
professionals.
- Report professional misconduct and insufficiently-skilled
practice to the appropriate authorities, respecting the need to
avoid unjustly discrediting the reputation of other health
professionals. The doctor should also facilitate professional
help and care for the other health professional if it is
indicated.
- Act with scrupulous fairness when required to act as an
expert commenting on the professional practice and behavior of
another health professional.
- Advocate for the rights and security of each health
professional to practice their profession within the law and
with protection from interference or intimidation from any
source.
- Not compel another health professional to act contrary to
their moral conviction or religious belief, except as required
by law and as delineated in FIGO's position on conscientious
objection.
- Promote professional behavior and help to resolve disputes
between health professionals.
With specific reference to the trainer/trainee–teacher/student
relationship:
The obstetrician and gynecologist should:
- Model professional behavior for trainees.
- Teach the concepts of professional behavior, ethical research,
and practice.
- Provide trainees with challenges to learn, without abuse,
harassment or humiliation.
- Not engage in sexual or romantic relations with those being
taught or supervised.
- Provide teaching, supervision, and training while respecting
personal boundaries.
- Allow the expression of disagreement without the fear of
punishment, reprisals or retribution.
- Provide clear guidelines to trainees and others regarding
assignments, examinations, and test environments.
- Provide objective, timely, fair, and constructive evaluations
of
trainees.
- Ensure that the research and clinical teaching environment
experiences are appropriate for the needs of the trainee.
- Clearly outline for students and trainees the appropriate
levels
of clinical responsibility.
- Allow trainees to decline to perform procedures which they
feel are outside their area of competence or inconsistent with
their personal beliefs.
References
1. FIGO document – ‘Ethical Issues in Obstetrics and Gynecology
by the FIGO Committee for the Study of ethical Aspects of Human
Reproduction and Women's Health'. November 2006
2. ‘The RANZCOG Code of Ethical Practice'. May 2006
3. ‘The RANZCOG Curriculum'. 2003
4. Whitcomb ME. Professionalism in Medicine. Acad Med. 2007; 82:
1009
5. Cohen J. Linking Professionalism to Humanism: What It Means,
Why It Matters. Acad Med. 2007; 82: 1029-1032
6. Medical Professionalism Project. Medical Professionalism in
the new millennium: physician's charter. Lancet. 2002;359:
520-522
7. Hickson GB. A Complementary Approach to Promoting
Professionalism: Identifying, Measuring, and Addressing
Unprofessional Behaviors. Acad Med. 2007; 82: 1040-1048
8. ‘Professional Standards for Faculty Members and Learners in
the Faculties of Medicine and Dentistry at the University of
British Columbia'. November 2003
9. Resolution on "Conscientious Objection". Adopted by FIGO
General Assembly 7/11/2006
Discussion
This statement represents the position of FIGO on standards of
behavior and communication for the obstetrician and gynecologist
in his/her relationships with all other health professionals,
whether medical or otherwise.
To serve our patients and our communities we must behave
ethically and professionally, not only toward our patients, but
also toward all of the other health professionals with whom we
work. Such behavior cannot be assumed; more than ever,
relationships with other health professionals are being
challenged and are proving more challenging.
Professional groups closely allied to obstetrics and gynecology
include midwifery and nursing. Role evolution within these
professions and the substitution of roles traditionally
undertaken by doctors is inevitably creating tensions between
the groups concerned. In addition, the promulgation by many
schools of midwifery of the "wellness" model in contrast to
medicine's "sickness" model, is creating further challenges at
all levels of professional interface. The doctor's relationships
with all those involved in health management can also be trying,
particularly when one considers the tempo of change in models of
healthcare delivery, the alteration in traditional
decision-making hierarchies, and the new paradigms being applied
to allocation of leadership in healthcare delivery. Challenges
by external bodies to the medical profession's construct of
self-regulation, including by some government agencies and
quality and safety monitors, bring their own pressures to bear
on relationships between professional groups.
The doctor's relationship with students, trainees, and with more
junior medical professionals has always carried specific
dimensions and difficulties, but in recent times further
potential stressors have emerged. Included here are changes over
time in the demographics of these groups, such as in the age
range and gender mix. Undoubtedly too, the introduction of "safe
hours" legislation in many jurisdictions is placing pressure on
relationships between senior and more junior doctors. There are
increasing demands on specialists to not only teach/tutor but to
be a "complete" teacher/tutor—a challenge that some doctors can
and do find harrowing.
The trend in many countries to increasing specialization and
subspecialization within obstetrics and gynecology is placing
strains on relationships between doctors. Clear and logical
boundaries, within which doctors with varying scopes of practice
can base their interactions, are not always evident. Handover of
patients and subsequent handback of patients can and does create
issues in everyday working situations. The
subspecialist/generalist interface can also raise perceptions of
status inequalities that can result in tensions, particularly if
income streams are affected.
It can be argued that matters of standards of behavior and
communication simply form one part of the doctor's broader "Code
of Ethical Practice" and that there is much already stated and
written to guide the doctor in these areas. Equally, much has
been written with regard to professionalism, its relationship to
ethical practice, and its place in shaping and influencing the
doctor's standards and behaviors. The underpinning of
professionalism by humanism is also well described as a key
enabler of true professionalism. Current guidance available to
the obstetrician and gynecologist includes:
- FIGO's document, "Ethical Issues in Obstetrics and
Gynecology" by the FIGO Committee for the Study of Ethical
aspects of Human Reproduction and Women's Health." Included
within this document (page 26) is a statement alluding to
"Professional Obligations to fellow Obstetricians Gynecologists."
- Many of FIGO's member societies have their own codes of
Ethics and/or Ethical Practice, some of which are based heavily
on FIGO documents. In addition, member societies frequently have
curriculum documents that may make reference to these matters.
- Positions and statements of national licensing authorities
and representative associations, including Medical Councils and
Boards.
- Professional charters and codes of Universities, Schools of
Medicine, and faculties.
However, even within these resources there is a relative paucity
of consolidated, clearly articulated, and readily accessible
information relevant to a doctor's conduct and practice when
interfacing with other health professionals. In presenting this
statement, FIGO, as the lead body in the specialty, aims to
guide the obstetrician and gynecologist in these matters and to
shape practice across all of its member societies.
THE PAUCITY OF FEMALE REPRESENTATION ON THE SASOG COUNCIL.
I am personally most concerned about the paucity of female
representation on the SASOG council. I am saddened by the
seeming disinterest of female SASOG members to serve on the
council, and in light of the fact that more and more female
doctors are qualifying as specialist obstetricians and
gynaecologists, I would like to challenge my valued lady
colleagues to stand for election to the SASOG council and
thereby contribute to SASOG's mission of "DELIVERING THE BEST
POSSIBLE STANDARD OF CARE AND PROMOTING THE HEALTH AND WELLBEING
OF ALL WOMEN IN SOUTH AFRICA."
I trust that you found the FIGO position statement on
Professional Standards useful and thought provoking, and I hope
that the rest of this year remains productive and enjoyable for
all SASOG members.
With my best wishes.
TONY KOLLER
PROF. A.B. KOLLER
PRESIDENT SASOG
|